Another thread like this? I'll say it again. Let's let jsr decide
Take it easy men. I think that jsr can find some useful things about Famitracker Users, or he can simply ignore all of this thread. I'm a programmer too, and user feedback is ALWAYS important.
Another thread like this? I'll say it again. Let's let jsr decide
Take it easy men. I think that jsr can find some useful things about Famitracker Users, or he can simply ignore all of this thread. I'm a programmer too, and user feedback is ALWAYS important.
That's not what I meant. I wasn't trying to sound mad or anything. I'm just saying if we wanna request something, that is fine, but ranting for 4 pages about it is won't decide for him. Though I guess it is good to talk a bit about it after requesting something.
Well, then I agree with you, but keep in mind that this is a discussion forum. What are we supposed to do here?. :P
Well yeah, but his request is almost like my (and many other) requests made already, which is having multiple sound expansions used at once, and imo having all sound expansions would make this request moot. But again, ya never know what jsr will decide.
Does NSF support dual chips? Like double 2A03? 'Cause then, if I were to go along with this idea that I don't exactly agree on in the first place, it'd be useful to just have a tick box for the module properties. Instead of choosing between chips, choose lists from 'em. Or even a number counter (can ya tell I don't know squat about GUI).
Not multiple sound CHIPS, but CHANNELS. Say you only have the 2AO3/2AO7 open, input the effect "X03" it only adds the MMC5 extension, not the whole CHIP!
Not multiple sound CHIPS, but CHANNELS. Say you only have the 2AO3/2AO7 open, input the effect "X03" it only adds the MMC5 extension, not the whole CHIP!
Nice, but how can you add more channels without adding a soundchip?.
A list of check boxes to choose which chips to use at a time would be a plausible way to go for me, but to be able to control which chips to use at which time throughout the tracker's sequencer is kind of hot from a "chipportunist" perspective. The thing to keep in mind is the different amount of combinations to correspond with different values for that effect, which would require an adequate description of said effect.
If it could be done, then that would rock out. I am just waiting for people to utilise this technology so it could be done live (if the idea is even compatible with NSF). For now, we have the Chuck Norris of Nintendo 8-bit trackers as it stands, practically.
Also, about having multiple 2A03/2A07s: MMC5 has the same pulse technology that the 2A chips had, and since one can use the VRC6's pulses and tweak them to 2A chip settings for pulses,
create a waveform for the triangle in FDS (and the pulses btw), and create pretty much all the waveforms for the 2A chips in N106 (a chip to be added whenever jsr gets around to doing that - I eagerly await that as much as it hurts to wait), I would have to say that there really is no need to ask for another copy of the 2A chips imo as long as you know how each chipset works - creativity is a wonderful thing.
IaTM's idea is pretty cool, I have to admit. I just don't know if it is feasible in NSF is all...
Anyway, that's my take on this. Not here to rain on anyone's parade or anything
_______________________
You now process Dracula's Rib. Good luck processing it...
