Login:
Menu:
Post: Author:
FamiTracker > General > FamiTracker Talk > New contest series! Owner: jrlepage New post
Page 3 of 5 Sort: Goto Page: << Previous [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] Next >>
Posted: 2012-03-02 05:49  (Last Edited: 2012-03-02 05:50) Reply | Quote
gyms



Member for: 5593 days
Status: Offline

#31220
jrlepage wrote:
anyone who submits Doggtales v2.0 will be DQ'd from the entire series of contest.


I definitely would vote a 'troll' entry lower than others that were seriously trying to convey original ideas, but, my opinion, DQ'ing anyone would be a bit of a killjoy, yea. With Doggtales being an exception, every FamiCompo troll entry in past years was always giggled at, but subsequently downvoted to the bottom of the stack.

If anything, could we DQ the high-votes of such entries? I think a voter who puts these kind of things higher than serious entries is more of a problem than the authors who submit them.

Posted: 2012-03-02 06:01 Reply | Quote
jrlepage
Moderator

Avatar

Member for: 6392 days
Location: Canada
Status: Offline

#31222
The DQ thing was a joke from the IRC conversation that led up to this contest, and wasn't meant to be taken seriously.

Posted: 2012-03-02 06:03 Reply | Quote
gyms



Member for: 5593 days
Status: Offline

#31223
shit my bad, haha. I'M SUCH A SQUARE

Posted: 2012-03-02 14:30 Reply | Quote
psn

Avatar

Member for: 5730 days
Location: England
Status: Offline

#31231
I've got a proposition for another category. Anyone remember those minimalist challenges that people were doing a while back where you're only allowed to use the classical format (2A03 with no DPCM) and one instrument? How about a category like that for originals (I imagine it would be hard to implement for covers)?. Especially if these are going to be judged using .ftms instead of .nsfs.

Posted: 2012-03-02 14:41 Reply | Quote
jrlepage
Moderator

Avatar

Member for: 6392 days
Location: Canada
Status: Offline

#31232
"Classical" is the category we'll be kicking off with (for both covers and originals)... Not sure how what you're proposing is different? Except for the 1-instrument thing, but that's needlessly crippling I think.

Posted: 2012-03-02 16:49 Reply | Quote
InterrobangPie

Avatar

Member for: 5607 days
Location: England
Status: Offline

#31233
jrlepage wrote:
I strongly discourage troll entries. I hate to be a killjoy but the motives of this contest are kind of serious in nature

Thus increasing my desire to do a troll entry (just as long as I can enter twice).

Posted: 2012-03-02 17:19  (Last Edited: 2012-03-02 17:21) Reply | Quote
jrlepage
Moderator

Avatar

Member for: 6392 days
Location: Canada
Status: Offline

#31234
retard

jk i luv u~

Seriously though, I haven't decided if there should be a maximum amount of entries per person yet. I guess we'll go with one or two per entrant at first and then adapt the rules to the degree of participation or something.

Posted: 2012-03-02 22:32 Reply | Quote
Dave
Moderator

Avatar

Member for: 7092 days
Location: UK
Status: Offline

#31237
one per entrant. quality > quantity, and that's especially important if it's going to be a showtune for FamiTracker, you wanna make sure people devote all their energy into one submission.

Posted: 2012-03-03 04:09 Reply | Quote
jrlepage
Moderator

Avatar

Member for: 6392 days
Location: Canada
Status: Offline

#31241
Fair point.

Posted: 2012-03-03 07:34  (Last Edited: 2012-03-03 07:35) Reply | Quote
lvk

Avatar

Member for: 5436 days
Status: Offline

#31242
I vote in favour of Dave, since modules demoing what the tracker is capable of would be a pretty big deal.

Would two modules make it in as demo modules per expansion chip (one original, one cover)? Or would a few of the best be included to display both technical skill and tracker capability, and some easier examples for people new to the program?

Posted: 2012-03-03 08:47 Reply | Quote
jrlepage
Moderator

Avatar

Member for: 6392 days
Location: Canada
Status: Offline

#31244
I'm not entirely sure yet. It might be just one per competition, three per competition or even three or four per chip (though that would require an extra voting process which people mightn't appreciate much). It really depends on how much demo material jsr is willing to bundle with the program, and how big the participation is. I suppose if we get 15 entries then it's fair to pick the best 3 modules, whereas if only 4 people submit then we'd have to go with only the best one. I guess 4-6 modules per sound chip on average would be a reasonable amount.

Posted: 2012-03-03 14:47 Reply | Quote
kinkinkijkin

Avatar

Member for: 5776 days
Location: Not where my face is
Status: Offline

#31247
Question.

Is "the current famitracker version" referring to the .8 beta or the .7 stable?

Posted: 2012-03-03 15:34 Reply | Quote
icesoldier

Avatar

Member for: 5518 days
Location: Amarillo, Texas, United States
Status: Offline

#31251
kinkinkijkin wrote:
Question.

Is "the current famitracker version" referring to the .8 beta or the .7 stable?

If I were to wager a guess, I'd say whatever the stable is at that time. Meaning, for now, use 0.3.7, but whenever 0.3.8 becomes stable, start using that instead.

_______________________
Website (includes FTM's of my covers)
Posted: 2012-03-03 15:58 Reply | Quote
kinkinkijkin

Avatar

Member for: 5776 days
Location: Not where my face is
Status: Offline

#31252
Ah, I see.

Posted: 2012-03-05 07:12 Reply | Quote
ElHuesudoII

Avatar

Member for: 5934 days
Status: Offline

#31302
well I guess 0.3.8 will be needed for Namco163

but that's just me

Page 3 of 5 Sort: Goto Page: << Previous [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] Next >>