A tool for making N163 and FDS waveforms Posted: 2013-01-03 07:16 (Last Edited: 2013-01-04 01:28 )
Reply |
Quote
furrykef
Member for: 6598 days Status: Offline
#43275
Attachments:
n163.ny (2 Kb)
rainwarrior
Member for: 5558 days Location: Canada Status: Offline
#43276
Interesting. I didn't know Audacity had an embedded lisp interpreter! I should be using this for stuff! Thanks for this.
jsr
Administrator
Member for: 7333 days Location: Sweden Status: Offline
#43279
Nice. This would be useful for FDS too if there was a way to select 64 steps instead of 16.
_______________________
Programmer and developer
za909
Member for: 5371 days Location: Hungary Status: Offline
#43280
Interesting, it usually gives me values between 7 and 13 and nothing else...should I make it even louder? Or not remove the DC offset?
Posted: 2013-01-03 16:37 (Last Edited: 2013-01-03 16:43 )
Reply |
Quote
cak
Member for: 5722 days Location: oregon Status: Offline
#43281
Maybe normalize after removing the offset?
P.S.> Rushjet1 made a similar app not too long ago. Still, it's pretty cool to have this in the form of an Audacity plugin.
furrykef
Member for: 6598 days Status: Offline
#43284
jsr wrote:
Nice. This would be useful for FDS too if there was a way to select 64 steps instead of 16.
I would have made an FDS version too, but there's no way to paste MML waveforms into Famitracker 0.4.0...
jsr
Administrator
Member for: 7333 days Location: Sweden Status: Offline
#43285
There is no text box for it, but the copy/paste wave buttons are actually using MML strings. Try pasting a FDS wave in notepad.
_______________________
Programmer and developer
furrykef
Member for: 6598 days Status: Offline
#43288
I stand corrected! The original post now has an FDS-capable version.
furrykef
Member for: 6598 days Status: Offline
#43290
I just added a "normalize result" feature, since I realized that normalizing the input doesn't mean the output will be normalized. That should fix the problems you're having, za909.
Curious
Member for: 5025 days Location: Sweden, In My Mom's Basement Status: Offline
#43842
_______________________
I have always been a curiously curious person.
(Sort of frequent mega poster here, beware!)
"Simple is always better. For something to sound simple, there has usually been a whole development cycle behind it." - David Wise
Im_a_Track_Man
Member for: 5546 days Location: Plantation, Florida Status: Offline
#43877
YAY! Now I can passively steal Gameboy waveforms (and no one will be any the wiser)!
_______________________
[BURNING LOVE]
YouTube
Twitter (Stay off my lawn, kids)
arookas
Member for: 5129 days Location: United States Status: Offline
#44092
Awesome! I use Audacity already for my Yoshi's Island recreations and this will be of great assistance.
Gamma
Member for: 5224 days Location: Alaska Status: Offline
#44095
This has done wonders for me so far. Thanks for making this!
Posted: 2013-03-29 18:03 (Last Edited: 2013-03-30 00:48 )
Reply |
Quote
ZexionTehWolf
Member for: 4938 days Location: London...? Status: Offline
#46071
I'm sure I'll be penalized for bumping an old thread, but I'm at the end of my tether with Audacity.
I followed all the steps in the original post on how to get the waveform values and whatnot, and whenever I try and achieve a waveform from my looped sample I get a pop-up box that simply says "Nyquist did not return audio"
Does anyone know how to fix this error that I somehow have run into inadvertently?
--EDIT--
The error has been resolved, sorry for any inconvenience.
_______________________
fucking awful forum
jrlepage
Moderator
Member for: 6391 days Location: Canada Status: Offline
#46091
How did you solve it? Going "nevermind problem solved" without mentioning your solution is rude to people who might encounter the same problem in the future.
_______________________
Follow me on Twitter .
I record (some) NSFs on hardware. Feel free to request a hardware render .